The following review is published as a spring 2026 feature in The High Window, and includes four poems selected from the collection.
_______
Parse Poetica by Estill Pollock. Broadstone Books (broadstonebooks.com). ISBN: 978-1-9666770-28-4.
In Parse
Poetica, Estill Pollock turns his attention to the subtle threshold where
language not only reports the world but begins to form a world of its own. The
title offers a quiet clue. To “parse” is to slow down, to attend to the joints
of grammar and the nuances of phrasing, to notice how meaning comes into being
through structure rather than declaration. It also gestures, lightly and
without didactic insistence, toward the long tradition of the ars poetica, from Horace’s reflections
on the art of poetry to Archibald MacLeish’s famous suggestion that a poem
should “not mean, but be”. Pollock does not write in the mode of manifesto.
Instead, he shares a more tentative curiosity about how language shapes
perception, inviting us to consider not simply what a poem says, but how it
comes into being at all.
Pollock is clearly fascinated by that
process, yet the collection never sinks into technical display. The poems
remain grounded in lived experience and in the physical presence of objects,
landscapes, and memories that refuse to resolve themselves neatly into
abstraction.
The cover image provides an illuminating
point of entry. A weathered cherub planter, its torso hollowed by time, now
shelters a vigorous burst of foliage. It is a figure at once damaged and
renewed. What was once decorative and human shaped has become host to unplanned
growth. The past remains visible, but it has been repurposed. This doubleness
of loss and persistence, erosion and unexpected flourishing, runs through much
of the collection, and I became increasingly aware of it as the book unfolded.
Pollock’s language is measured, stripped
back, and often understated. The poems work more by suggestion than by
declaration. They rely on implication, on the spaces between statements, on
images allowed to resonate without being over explained. Many of the pieces
unfold associatively rather than narratively. Connections are glimpsed, then
withheld. As a reader, I found myself slowing down. The poems seem to insist
upon that pace, trusting that meaning will surface if one is prepared to stay
with them.
The world we move through here is
insistently tactile. Wood, stone, foliage, weathered domestic interiors recur
with quiet persistence. They are not decorative props. They become sites of
reflection, holding memory and time in ways that language can only partially
approach. There is a moral seriousness in the way Pollock looks at such things.
Attention, for him, feels like a form of care. To look carefully is to
acknowledge both the presence of the object and one’s own implicated relation
to it.
One of the book’s great strengths lies in
its refusal to hurry. Pollock resists the neat epiphany or the lyrical flourish
that tidies experience into a single meaning. Instead, uncertainty is allowed
to remain part of the poem’s fabric. Recognition, when it arrives, feels
gradual and earned. The quietness of tone, rarely rhetorical and never showy,
gives the poems room to breathe. They respect the reader’s intelligence and
invite participation rather than passive consumption.
At times, the lyric surface opens briefly
into something more luminous. A phrase sharpens, an image clarifies, and the
emotional register deepens almost imperceptibly. Because such moments are not
chased, they feel earned. When feeling emerges, it rises from within the
texture of the poem rather than as an effect imposed from above.
Two poems in particular, Simile and Nevermind, crystallise the wider concerns of the book. In each,
ordinary perception is tilted just enough to become strange, as if we are being
asked to look again without the comfort of habit. The language remains
restrained, yet the emotional current is unmistakable. For me, these poems echo
the image on the cover, not directly, but in the way an image can itself
function as a form of language.
Pollock’s commitment to economy and
fragmentation can, at moments, be demanding. Connective tissue is deliberately
withheld. Syntax fractures. Transitions arrive late, if at all. Readers who
prefer narrative continuity or more transparent lyric statements may sometimes
feel held at a distance. Yet the difficulty rarely feels gratuitous.
Crucially, Parse Poetica does not collapse into abstraction or self absorption
about language for its own sake. Pollock’s awareness of linguistic limits is
matched by an awareness of embodiment, environment, and time’s steady pressure.
Words both reveal and fail. They illuminate while also casting shadow.
What Parse
Poetica ultimately offers is not a thesis about poetry, but an invitation
to read, and perhaps to live, more slowly.
_______
Kevin Morris has worked across secondary
and higher education as a teacher, senior leader, inspector, and academic.
Influenced by the rise of critical theory in the 1980s, he wrote his
undergraduate dissertation on Raymond Williams and his Master’s thesis on The Calendar of Modern Letters, a precursor to Scrutiny.
He is an external examiner for teacher education programmes, an A-level
examiner for Drama and Theatre Studies, and a school governor in North London.
_______
Review copyright Kevin Morris 2026.
%20(1).jpg)